Brian
Williams was used as a scapegoat. This means that he was singled of a lot of
people (including Hillary Clinton and Bill O’ Reilly) who had lied but he was
the only one who was punished. Socrates was also singled out by the Athenian
government for his ideas and corrupting the youth even though there were a lot
of other philosophers and people who had crazier ideas than him and were worse.
Socrates and Brian Williams both were accused of corrupting people’s mind and
telling them lies. The type of
knowledge is not as important as the fact that, with the Modern Socratic
Method, the knowledge gained is specifically anticipated by the Socratic
questioner. This stands in contrast to the Classic Socratic method in which the
actual outcomes are unknown by all parties. Like Brian William he wasn't using
his knowledge for the things that were about to happen, and the people that would questioned him will make him think that what he did was not the actual
outcomes by all parties.
Socrates
style of conversation involved his own denial of knowledge (Socratic irony). In
these conversations, Socrates became the student and made those he questioned
the teacher. Socrates rejected any attempts to pass off another person's ideas
or the beliefs of the majority as truth. Socrates was not interested in the
talk of others. Like Brian Williams his style of conversation involved his own
denial of knowledge in ironic way as well by him knowing that if he lied and
over exaggerated his stories people would be impressed. Kids would think he is courageous and brave
but he like Socrates rejected any attempts to pass off another person’s ideas
or beliefs of the majority as truth.